SubscribeAdd blog to your RSS feed
FeedbackWe'd like to hear from you
- The Inbox – Liar, Liar, Pants on Fire
- Third Circuit Derails “Executive Fast Track” Case
- F-Squared Filing Again Illustrates Corporate Bankruptcy Perils for Executives
- The Inbox – Some Like It Not
- Boilerplate Terms in Employment Agreements May Trap the Unwary
- Are You the Vice President in Charge of Going to Jail?
- The Inbox – Trick-or-Treat?
- Court Rejects American Apparel Founder’s Bid for Advancement and Indemnification
- With Yates Memo, the DOJ aims to prosecute more corporate executives. But will there be unintended consequences?
- The Inbox – No Fall Guys Allowed
- "Key Man" Provisions
- After-Acquired Evidence
- Age Discrimination
- Arbitration and ADR
- Breach of Contract
- Campaign Finance
- Change-in-Control Provisions
- Civil Litigation
- Data Security
- Dodd-Frank Act
- Equal Pay
- Executive Compensation
- Family Medical Leave
- Fiduciary Duties
- Fifth Amendment
- First Amendment
- Government Employers and Employees
- Indemnification and Advancement
- Intellectual Property
- Monthly Roundup
- Motions to Dismiss
- Noncompete Agreements
- Pregnancy Discrimination
- Preliminary Injunction
- Religious Discrimination
- Sarbanes-Oxley Act
- Section 1983
- Severance Agreements
- Social Media
- Statutes of limitations
- Summary Judgment
- Termination With or Without Cause
- The Basics
- The Inbox
- The Yates Memo
- Title VII
- Trade Secrets
- Vicarious Liability
- Wage and Hour
- White Collar Crime
- Workplace Conditions (Occupational Safety and Health)
- Wrongful Termination
Blogs We Like:
The AmLaw Daily
The BLT: The Blog of LegalTimes
Connecticut Employment Law Blog
The D&O Diary
Delaware Employment Law Blog
DeNovo: A Virginia Appellate Law Blog
The Employer Handbook
Executive Pay Matters
The Federal Criminal Appeals Blog
Grand Jury Target
Screw You Guys, I’m Going Home: What You Need To Know Before You Scream “I Quit,” Get Fired, Or Decide to Sue the Bastards
Trade Secrets & Noncompete Blog
Virginia Appellate News & Analysis
WSJ Law Blog
The Inbox, May Day Edition
As a blog focused on employment issues, we’d be remiss if we didn’t at least note that the week that’s ending included May Day, which has long been known as International Workers’ Day. Although this day’s somewhat curious history includes support from Marxists, Socialists, and the Catholic Church, it really got its start after a bloody bombing and riot in Chicago’s Haymarket Square.
Fortunately for us at Suits-by-Suits, the employment disputes we deal with most – mainly executives and the companies that employ them – don’t lead to bloody confrontation, only (sometimes) litigation. Though even litigation sometimes has its moments.
Anyway, here’s what has come over that transom that has piqued our interest:
- We were waiting for this issue to come up: The Colorado Court of Appeals held that Dish Network did not run afoul of the Colorado Lawful Off-Duty Activities Statute (which prohibits employers from firing employees for doing things off the clock that are legal) when Dish Network fired a quadriplegic man for failing a drug test. The man uses medical marijuana to control muscle spasms. Under Colorado statute, that marijuana use cannot be criminally prosecuted by the state. In a 2-1 decision, the court held that Dish could fire the man because the court could “find no legislative intent to extend employment protection to those engaged in activities that violate federal law.”
- From the “Oh, Really?” Department: Con Edison has disclosed in its annual proxy statement that its executives were awarded more than $600,000 for their “exemplary” work in 2012. Some are questioning how exemplary the executives’ performance could have been in a year when 1.1 million ConEd customers lost power during Hurricane Sandy.
- We recommend this recent commentary in the New York Times about the mixed reviews for the SEC’s whistleblower office, which was inaugurated in August 2011 partly in response to criticism that Bernie Madoff’s scheme could have been uncovered sooner if the SEC had taken seriously the reports of some tipsters.
- Here’s some interesting advice from recruiters about non-compete agreements when you’re changing fields.
- The very curious suit against William Koch, one of the multibillionaire Koch Brothers, in which the plaintiff – a former Koch executive – alleges that Koch and his employees falsely imprisoned him at a Colorado ranch will proceed, a federal judge decided this week.
- Whatever happened to good old Netscape: Opera Software is reportedly filing suit in Norway against one its software designers, Trond Werner Hansen, after some of Hansen’s work wound up in a browser being designed by rival Mozilla. Mozilla is not named in the suit.
- Drive the Chevy to the Levee, but not the bank (yet): the U.S. Treasury, which holds 16.4% of the company’s shares, has declined to allow GM to give out substantial raises this year – although the CEO still makes more than $9 million.
- Speaking of money: a federal judge in New York approved Merrill Lynch’s $21 million dollar settlement of a class action with over 1000 former brokers. The brokers alleged Merrill had improperly denied them deferred compensation.