Feedback
We'd like to hear from youContributing Editors
Recent Posts
- From Flowers And Cemeteries To Barbecue And Beaches: How We Got Memorial Day
- Against the Odds, High Court Will Hear Whistleblower Case
- The Inbox - May 17, 2013
- Supreme Court Considering Whether to Accept Sarbanes-Oxley Whistleblower Case
- Farmers Insurance Wins Summary Judgment on Ex-Employee’s Breach of Contract
- The Inbox - May 10, 2013
- Martensen v. Koch, Venue, and You
- Martensen v. Koch, Personal Jurisdiction, and You
- The Inbox, May Day Edition
- Don’t Mess With The Lawyers (Or Other Public Employees), Part 2
Topics
- Whistleblowers
- Civil Litigation
- Breach of Contract
- Family Medical Leave
- Social Media
- Confidentiality
- Age Discrimination
- Severance Agreements – Change-in-Control Provisions
- Executive Compensation
- Dodd-Frank Act Clawbacks
- Motions to Dismiss
- The Inbox
- Religious Discrimination
- Workplace Conditions (Occupational Safety and Health)
- Indemnification
- Monthly Roundup
- Fiduciary Duties
- Wage and Hour
- Releases
- Trade Secrets
- Arbitration and ADR
- Discovery
- Statutes of limitations
- Wrongful Termination
- Equal Pay
- After-Acquired Evidence
- Discrimination
- Pregnancy Discrimination
- Summary Judgment
- Title VII
- Arbitration
- The Basics
- Preliminary Injunction
- Insurance
- D&O
Archives
Quick Links
Visit Zuckerman Spaeder LLP's website
Blogs We Like:
The AmLaw Daily
The BLT: The Blog of LegalTimes
Connecticut Employment Law Blog
The D&O Diary
Delaware Employment Law Blog
DeNovo: A Virginia Appellate Law Blog
The Employer Handbook
Executive Pay Matters
The Federal Criminal Appeals Blog
Lawffice Space
SCOTUSblog
Screw You Guys, I’m Going Home: What You Need To Know Before You Scream “I Quit,” Get Fired, Or Decide to Sue the Bastards
Trade Secrets & Noncompete Blog
Virginia Appellate News & Analysis
Win-Win HR
WSJ Law Blog
Court Order: You Shall Not Start Your New Job at that Oil Company Because We're Worried About Irreparable Harm to the Oil Company You Just Quit
Engineer Milos Milosevic may have thought that he and Schlumberger Technology Corporation were like oil and water when he recently left Schlumberger, which provides services to the oil and gas industry, to work for Halliburton Company, a direct competitor. On Friday, a Texas state court said not so fast, and issued a temporary restraining order (or TRO) against Dr. Milosevic that prohibits him from starting his new job at Halliburton. The court also ordered Dr. Milosevic to “restrain from using or disclosing [Schlumberger’s] trade secrets,” and to “immediately return” any of Schlumberger’s documents or other property. Schlumberger requested the TRO at the outset of a lawsuit that it filed against Dr. Milosevic for breach of a non-compete contract and misappropriation of trade secrets.
Courts differ on the factors that they consider in deciding whether to issue a TRO, but almost all courts require a showing that the party seeking the TRO would suffer “irreparable harm” absent the TRO, and weigh that against the harm of a TRO to its target. Irreparable harm is harm that cannot be remedied by the payment of money – such as the destruction of an historic building.
In the employment context, some courts have concluded that the payment of money cannot repair the damage done by the disclosure of trade secrets to a direct competitor, and have found that the danger of irreparable harm to the employer outweighs the damage caused to the former employee who is prevented from starting a new job. The Texas state court reached that conclusion in issuing the TRO against Dr. Milosevic.
TRO proceedings tend to be ex parte, which means that the target of the TRO does not have advance notice of the proceedings or the chance to respond. The idea is that, if the target had notice, he would swing his wrecking ball before the court could order him not to tear down the building. Or, in Dr. Milosevic’s case, he would divulge all of Schlumberger’s secrets to Halliburton, giving Halliburton the competitive advantage to drive Schlumberger out of the oil business. TROs usually have expiration dates and set a date for a hearing on whether the court should issue a longer-lasting preliminary injunction. The TRO against Dr. Milosevic expires in two weeks, when the court will have a hearing on whether to issue a preliminary injunction.

